|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 4 post(s) |
Bron Ander Haltern
Unholy Knights of Cthulhu Test Alliance Please Ignore
2
|
Posted - 2017.06.09 11:33:47 -
[1] - Quote
Hopefully that change will be as much painfull for you as for us CCP . You slowly shoot down all goals for casual players in the game shame and really sad you make wow out of eve . |
Bron Ander Haltern
Unholy Knights of Cthulhu Test Alliance Please Ignore
5
|
Posted - 2017.06.09 15:41:35 -
[2] - Quote
Jenn aSide wrote:
It only looks like a conspiracy to people too shortsighted to understand that CCP is helping everyone (including the carrier ratters) with the changes they are making.
You crazy? |
Bron Ander Haltern
Unholy Knights of Cthulhu Test Alliance Please Ignore
6
|
Posted - 2017.06.09 15:48:51 -
[3] - Quote
Yes indeed especially that quote: " Patch notes for June 2017 release 2017-06-09 15:34
Patch notes for June 2017 release Released on Tuesday, June 13th, 2017 Features & Changes Balancing:
Respawn cooldowns have been added to Nullsec Asteroid Cluster mining anomalies and Excavator drones have had their speed and yields reduced slightly. More details can be found in this forum thread. Fighters have had their damage reduced. More details can be found in this forum thread.
Exploration:
The chance of obtaining a random escalation from certain high-level combat anomalies has been reduced somewhat. The drop rate of pirate faction battleship blueprints has been reduced across several NPCs. " |
Bron Ander Haltern
Unholy Knights of Cthulhu Test Alliance Please Ignore
6
|
Posted - 2017.06.09 16:33:41 -
[4] - Quote
That is a dark Friday, and it has started so innocent I got up look at the evemon and frozen all my accounts stoped then it was only worse fighters changes and all now server crashed. Is it a serious bussiness or just a game? |
Bron Ander Haltern
Unholy Knights of Cthulhu Test Alliance Please Ignore
6
|
Posted - 2017.06.09 19:55:59 -
[5] - Quote
Ok so next patch we will be buying ships directly from CCP Is that you are heading for? |
Bron Ander Haltern
Unholy Knights of Cthulhu Test Alliance Please Ignore
8
|
Posted - 2017.06.09 21:48:56 -
[6] - Quote
CCP Quant wrote " When you can reliably sit and make 500-780M pure isk/hr** pr. account** " He definitely does not know what he is writting about. Who told them this? Is this a CSM idea about ratting in a carrier/super? That just scares and embarrasses me that they got no idea about the game they make. |
Bron Ander Haltern
Unholy Knights of Cthulhu Test Alliance Please Ignore
8
|
Posted - 2017.06.10 07:18:47 -
[7] - Quote
CCP Do you realize that by making that simple cut you make caldari and amarr carrier/supers a pure hobby horse crap! |
Bron Ander Haltern
Unholy Knights of Cthulhu Test Alliance Please Ignore
9
|
Posted - 2017.06.11 16:11:50 -
[8] - Quote
I've just unsubbed 9 accounts but I am not quiting. Frigates for the win! |
Bron Ander Haltern
Unholy Knights of Cthulhu Test Alliance Please Ignore
9
|
Posted - 2017.06.12 08:41:23 -
[9] - Quote
The problem is that all these nerf changes both fighters and ror cuts above all hit directly the casual player that has one or two accounts because sharks will always adopt to the situation and they got enough money to change profile of their ventures. CCP made a lot of mistakes that where mentioned earlier like for example new sov, skill injectors, citadels mechanic so to mention a few. Simple cuts in fighter and ror stats will not solve the economic problem of eve market because they lead to another cuts in other places and so on and on and on, that is not a solution! And we all know that game is not in balance already.
I have struggled a lot to get to the place where I will be able to fly caps since it was my high end (ultimate goal) in the game but tomorrow my amarr and caldari super/carriers will become pure garbage and I assure you that does not concern only 1% of the 1% of players.
Fighters cuts will make changes in areas of pve, pvp and citadel defense possibilities so it is not simple cut it will more certain trigger more cuts and it will not solve the market problem first of all.
The tomorrow hasty, introduced without consultations and tests patch will affect world of EVE tremendously and will change wiev of a lot of players on the game.
If CCP wanted to curb the market it would cut bounties or limit the amounts of clients per computer and amount of pumped isks to the system were diminished next day.
I say again CCP do not follow that path!
|
Bron Ander Haltern
Unholy Knights of Cthulhu Test Alliance Please Ignore
11
|
Posted - 2017.06.12 10:35:54 -
[10] - Quote
There is nowhere in economic report any data that shows clearly what ship classes get the most bounty so they can stick that report you know where in regard of supporting fighters cut. |
|
Bron Ander Haltern
Unholy Knights of Cthulhu Test Alliance Please Ignore
14
|
Posted - 2017.06.12 14:44:22 -
[11] - Quote
Let's sum up what we got so far. Since facts are flooded with gibberish over and over on the forum.
CCP Larkin has written:
"1. We are making this change because Carriers & Super carriers are too strong in PvE, specifically anomaly ratting in Nullsec.... (there are no hard data in the report about what ship class generates what amount of, so basically it is not sure what makes CCP thinks like that unless it is an assumption or an opinion or a guess (might be educated but still a guess) on the subject.)
2. We also think that Carriers and Super carriers are a bit too effective in PvP.... (on what basis again? It is arguable. The kestrel and rattle pilot will always say supers/carriers are OP while caps pilot just opposite"
On the basis of these two assumptions CCP decided to massively cut damage of fighters and nerf their sustainability on anomalies.
The proposed changes were announced all of sudden 5 days before the introductory patch without testing it on sisi. (Why this rush for CCP, honestly?)
The fighters changes will have tremendous impact on: 1 PVE side of the game; 2 PVP side of the game; 3 Citadel defense abilities.
It will also ruin most players dreams, goals and game play (not everybody is RMTers or multi account farmer) those who wants to develop, want to grow in order to be faster, better, stronger, not eternal kestrels or rattlesnakes pilots.
At the end CCP Dev writes we will introduce the changes, observe and adjust.
And I wouldn't say a damn word if EVE was not advertised as a game that is developed with players where Devs listen what players have to say.
|
Bron Ander Haltern
Unholy Knights of Cthulhu Test Alliance Please Ignore
14
|
Posted - 2017.06.12 14:55:19 -
[12] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Akrasjel Lanate wrote:CCP Larrikin wrote:This is primarily due to NPC Bounties.
This trend is unsustainable. Having such a large ISK faucet is bad for the economy, and this ISK faucet is concentrated to a relatively small number of players. Then why won't you simply decrease reward from NPC Bounties. Nerfing one ship type won't solve the problem. Because that also hurts the many more people who were not causing a problem.
Players that play a computer game paying real money for it are causing problems, seriously? Why because they play too much with too big ships? |
|
|
|